Archive - Theology RSS Feed

Why I love health care professionals

My wife and I are very fortunate to have several friends who are health care professionals or are in the process of becoming so. Until recently, I knew very little about the medical profession or the schooling it requires. It has been interesting to learn more about the process of applying, interviewing, studying and eventually being placed so that you can work incredibly long hours for little starting pay. The process is daunting, and has many implications for religious studies, but I am even more fascinated with the health care professionals themselves. In fact, I love health care professionals.

For one, they know that something is wrong. Several of our medical friends share different thoughts on theology and religion, but they all agree that there is something wrong with sickness, disease and pain. And if they don’t, then they aren’t very business savvy – it would be a silly decision to enter a profession that relies on people being concerned about being well if you don’t agree that there is something inherently wrong with not being well.

Not only do they know that something is wrong, but they see it as their role to fix it. No doubt there are several motives for entering into a health care profession, some of which are quite poor. But overwhelmingly the people I know are pursuing this career because of a true desire to help people. For some reason they are able to study for hours on end (or in rare and strange cases they just get biology) and want to use that gift to help those in need. That is worth recognizing.

I think the real root of why I love health care professionals is because health care itself is a beautiful shadow of a greater reality. A broken arm in need of restoration found in a great and competent healer screams the Gospel. A disease that has corrupted an organ enough to require replacement in order for the patient to truly live is an eye-opening picture of Regeneration. And sometimes, when all is said and done and death still comes, there remains a sobering reminder that we are not invincible. But every once in a while the unlikely treatment works, the MRI comes back negative or results simply defy explanation we are reminded of the events of Easter morning, when the old ways of death and decay were defeated and the prelude to our future restoration in Christ had begun.

So, health care professionals (and those still studying), this is what you are a part of. I know you won’t all agree with all of this, but thanks for what you do. I admire your work and attitudes, and probably don’t tell you enough.

Piper on Social and Political action

A dead-on answer to a great question, from John Piper over at the Desiring God blog:

Question:

Should the Church work on Social and Political problems?

Yes . . .

If you mean: Should ten million Christians take 10 hours a week spent watching TV, and give that time to worthy social and political engagement.

No . . .

If you mean: The pastors should leave their Bible study and pulpits and counseling and evangelism, and put that time into politics and social ministries.

Article: Baptism for the Remission of Sins

The following is an Article written for this site in hopes of addressing critical questions regarding Christianity and Baptism. Feel free to read it here, or view/save/print the PDF here. For more Articles click here, or to take a look and give feedback on upcoming articles and essays click here.

—-

Baptism for the Remission of Sins

The New Testament and Nicene Creed on Salvation

In the Nicene Creed, a document dating back to A.D. 325, revised in A.D. 381 and affirmed by all major Christian denominations, we find the phrase:

“We acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins”

What is this one baptism? Is the creed teaching that water baptism is salvation? Where did this phrase come from? Christianity is a faith that is rooted in historical events and documents, and the answers to these questions are significant for our understanding of the nature of God and salvation. Before we begin, a few introductory points are to be made.

First, a detailed description of New Testament thought concerning baptism is beyond the scope of this article. As we will soon see, because of how dependent the writers of the Creed were on the text of the New Testament, your interpretation of baptism in the New Testament will heavily determine your interpretation of “one baptism for the remission of sins” in the Creed. Instead I hope to show that the New Testament and the Creed are in unison in their affirmation that salvation is through Jesus Christ alone.

Second, regardless of your belief concerning baptism, both the New Testament and the Creed emphasize the significance of those who are in union with Christ displaying that union through water baptism.

Background on the Creed

For much of the first 300 years of the Church, there was open and legal persecution of Christians in the Roman empire. While Christianity spread quickly during the first few centuries, the persecution prevented the open meeting of Church leaders. By the beginning of the 4th century several differing doctrines concerning the Deity of Jesus of Nazareth rose in popularity. At the height of the persecution of the Christian Church, Constantine became emperor of Rome and issued the Edict of Milan, which protected Christians from persecution, allowed public religious gatherings and in some cases, ordered the return of stolen property.

In 325 A.D. the first world-wide council of Christian Bishops met to discuss, among other things, an orthodox view on the Divinity of Jesus. During the Counsel of Nicea, the first version of the Nicene Creed was drafted and approved. In 381 A.D. at the First Counsel of Constantinople, the original creed was affirmed and amended to address lingering issues relating to the person of Jesus. Also added to the Creed was the phrase:

“We believe In one holy catholic and apostolic Church; we acknowledge one baptism for the remission of sins; we look for the resurrection of the dead, and the life of the world to come. Amen.”

So what does “one baptism for the remission of sins” really mean? Was it the belief of the writers of the Creed that this “one baptism” saves you? Where did the writers of the Creed look for salvation? To answer these questions, we need to look at what both the Creed and the New Testament say about salvation.

The Creed and the New Testament on Salvation

According to the Nicene Creed, the following are “for our salvation:”

  1. [Jesus] came down from heaven (John 6:33, 35)
  2. [Jesus] was incarnate by the Holy Spirit through the Virgin Mary (Luke 1:35)
  3. [Jesus] was made man (John 1:14)
  4. [Jesus] was crucified for us under Pontius Pilate (Mark 15:25, 1 Corinthians 15:3)
  5. [Jesus] suffered (Mark 8:31)
  6. [Jesus] was buried (Luke 23:52, 1 Corinthians 15:4)
  7. [Jesus] rose again (Luke 24:1, 1 Corinthians 15:4)
  8. [Jesus] ascended into heaven (Luke 24:51, Acts 1:10)
  9. [Jesus] sits at the right hand of the Father (Mark 16:19, Acts 7:55)

Without a doubt, the writers of the Creed looked to Jesus alone for their salvation. Their reliance on the New Testament for this knowledge is unquestionable. In fact, their reliance on the New Testament for the language of “one baptism for the remission of sins” is also clear.

Peter’s first recorded sermon found in Acts 2:38 is one of the many references to baptism and the remission or forgiveness of sins in the New Testament. To say that there is a clear, universally accepted interpretation of this text and others would be quite misleading. To a great extent, how you view baptism as taught in the New Testament determines how you view the Creed’s “one baptism for the remission of sins.” The above nine statements on what was done “for us” and “for our salvation” must not be ignored when deciding what to do with the phrase “one baptism for the remission of sins.”

So the writers of the Creed were fully committed to Christ as the only basis for salvation. But they also considered baptism essential enough to include it in one of Christianity’s first major creeds.

Significance of Baptism

For those who believe in regenerative baptism, the significance of the act of baptism is clear. But for those who view baptism as strictly symbolic there can be a tendency to diminish the significance of the act of water baptism. Two remarks regarding this mindset and on this topic are in order.

First, baptism is a symbol or sign of a greater reality, namely salvation itself. There is a much closer link between the symbol (baptism) and the reality (salvation) than is often apparent. This reality is not unique to baptism. Here we turn to what Tyson Guthrie wrote on the topic (see Nicene Creed in 24 Days):

“Sometimes the things that are only part of an event are used to describe that event. A wise poet once wrote, “If you liked it then you should have put a ring on it.”  This phrase only works because everyone knows what Beyoncé means when she says “put a ring on it.” We all know what she means because the symbol of a ring is so closely connected to marriage that you can call getting married “putting a ring on it.”  This is why the Nicene Creed can call coming to faith “baptism.” When Peter holds an evangelistic meeting in Acts 2, and people want to respond in faith, Peter does not say “come forward and one of our leaders will pray with you.”  He says, “repent and be baptized in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.”(Acts 2:38)  When Paul wants to remind the Roman church what happened to them when they believed, he says “don’t you know that all of us who were baptized into Christ Jesus…”(Rom. 6:3) No one assumes that putting a ring on your left hand makes you married, and we must be careful not to think that getting dunked in water makes you a Christian.  We must also be careful not to ignore this biblical command and symbol simply because many people have placed too much value in it.”

Second, while there are isolated examples of salvation without baptism (think the thief on the cross in Luke 23:43), overwhelmingly those who come to faith in Christ throughout the New Testament and early Christianity show it through water baptism. Where there is a tendency to diminish the act of baptism because of the way some have abused or misrepresented it, some serious reflection on this reality is needed.

Concluding Thoughts

There is much more to baptism than is presented here. In fact, the phrase “one baptism” possibly has even more implications and controversy than does “for the remission of sins.” If one result of this article is planting in you the desire to further study the reality of baptism I will be thrilled. While there is plenty more to say regarding baptism, my hope is that through this article you would gain an appreciation for the intentional study of the historical aspect of Christianity and seek to further understand God and His plan to redeem mankind through Jesus Christ.

Additional Resources for Further Study:

  1. Ferguson, Everett. Baptism in the early church: history, theology, and liturgy in the first five centuries. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing, 2008.
  2. D.F. Wright, “The Meaning and Reference of “One Baptism for the Remission of Sins” in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan Creed,” Papers Presented to the Tenth International Conference on Patristic Studies Held in Oxford 19 (1987).

Quick thoughts from my Justification paper

I am still working on the Baptism and the Nicene Creed article, there has been too much good reading to pass up! Just wanted to share a quick thought from the paper I just wrote on Justification and New Perspectives on Paul:

The main banner of the New Perspectives has been reading Paul the way he intended to be read. At various times throughout the twentieth century, that meant ensuring that Paul was read in his Jewish context. Perhaps in the twenty-first century it means protecting against the overcorrection towards which the Church is often so prone to bend.

Page 4 of 14« First...«23456»10...Last »