The New Testament and the People of God

One of my goals this summer is to get as far as I can (while still taking RTS classes) in Wight’s Christian Origins and the Question of God series. As I am currently in Part Two of his first volume, The New Testament and the People of God, I thought it would be interesting to post Wright’s goal for this first volume (and what I will spend much of the next month thinking through):

This first volume, then, in one sense introduces the entire project at hand, but in another stands by itself. It argues for a particular way of doing history, theology, and literary study in relation to the questions of the first century; it argues for a particular way of understanding first-century Judaism and first-century Christianity; and it offers a preliminary discussion of the meaning of the word ‘god’ within the thought-forms of these groups, and the ways in which such historical and theological study might be of relevance for the modern world.

Exciting isn’t it?

Ancient Hebrews and Systematic Theology

In listening to Kevin J. Vanhoozer’s lecture during the 2010 Wheaton Theology Conference with N.T. Wright, I began to think through the role that Systematic Theology should play in the formation of Christian Doctrine. Here are some questions I have been chewing on:

How Jewish is Christianity? What role does one’s answer to that question play in how much emphasis is placed on Systematic (vs. Biblical or Historical) Theology? Were the Hebrew Scriptures or those who read/wrote them concerned with a systematic approach to what they were presenting?

Heaven as a progressive state?

For both of you reading, you may have noticed that I haven’t really been plowing through Love Wins. Real life, school and school have gotten in the way. That being said, as a result of reading the book, I am almost finished with a paper for one of my seminary classes centered around a harmony I noticed in the works of Jonathan Edwards and Rob Bell. A quick preview:

In exploring various historical works on heaven from theologians within the Reformed tradition, it is those of Jonathan Edwards that most often resonate with many of Bell’s claims. Specifically, both Jonathan Edwards and Rob Bell present a heaven that is progressive in nature. While room is left for variance between the two as to the degree of the progressive nature of heaven, Edwards and Bell agree that the state of those in heaven is not static. Instead, both present heaven as a place of continued personal growth in knowledge and understanding of the Triune God. A brief word on to the current state of popular Christian thought regarding heaven, followed by a look at both Bell and Edwards’ progressive heavens will lead to concluding thoughts that provide a possible harmony of the two views.

Thoughts?

Love Wins, Chapter Two: Heaven

We know one thing about Rob Bell as a result of this chapter; he knows and reads N.T. Wright. For those who don’t yet know Wright and might be interested in meeting him, check out this handy flow chart.

Back to Love Wins.

This is a book about heaven, hell and the fate of every person who ever lived.

And this is a chapter about heaven.

Bell clearly demonstrates where he stands on the issue of the nature of heaven. He convincingly (at least to one/me who holds roughly the same view as Bell on this issue) argues against a view of heaven that involves disembodied souls floating around on clouds playing harps. Instead, Bell argues for a heaven that is much more “earthy,” the kind of heaven you would expect from heaven meeting earth.

Along the way, he also makes some interesting observations about God’s justice and anger that many who reviewed the book before they read it might find surprising. Things like:

It’s important to remember this the next time we hear people say they can’t believe in a ‘God of judgement’ … Yes, they can. Often, we can think of little else. Every oil spill, every report of another woman sexually assaulted, every news report that another political leader has silenced the opposition through torture, imprisonment and execution … we shake our fist and cry ‘Will somebody please do something about this?’

Same with the word ‘anger.’ When we hear people saying they can’t believe in a God who gets angry–yes, they can. How should God react to a child being forced into prostitution? How should God feel about a country starving while warlords hoard the food supply?

Not leaving us to think that all the world’s problems are out there, Bell points out:

… [we] find ourselves thrilled by this promise of the world made right, [but this promise] brings with it the haunting thought that we each know what lurks in our own heart–our role in corrupting the world, the litany of ways in which our own sins have contributed to the heartbreak we’re surrounded by…

Then Bell shifts and presents the idea that heaven is at least partially confrontational:

But heaven also confronts. Heaven, we learn, has teeth, flames, edges and sharp points. What Jesus is insisting with the rich man is that certain things simply will not survive in the age to come. Like coveting. And greed.

More specifically, Bell mentions 1 Corinthians 3:12-15, where Paul speaks of Christ as the only real foundation and what humans chose to build on top of that foundation. Saying that:

Some in this process [of the fire-like removal of what should not be there] will find that they spent their energies and efforts on things that won’t be in heaven-on-earth.

Paul makes it very clear that we will have our true selves revealed and that once the sins and habits and bigotry and pride and petty jealousies are prohibited and removed, for some there simply won’t be much left. ‘As one escaping through the flames’ is how he put it.

So there is confrontation, destroying of things that don’t belong and the realization that we are more flawed than we ever imagined. And this is in a chapter on heaven. There is plenty in this chapter on the splendor of our future of heaven-on-earth, but space is not taken here to elaborate.

For those who have never been exposed to non-Platonian views of the Christian heaven, this chapter might be groundbreaking. Other than that, if orthodox understanding of heaven is the goal, Rob Bell is at least shooting in the right direction. He ends the chapter with a summary of what he presented:

There’s heaven now, somewhere else. There’s heaven here, sometime else. And then there’s Jesus’s invitation to heaven here and now, in this moment, in this place.

Page 5 of 26« First...«34567»1020...Last »